The UK Supreme Court Just Defined “Woman” by Biological Sex — And It’s a Blow to Trans Rights
We wish we weren’t writing this. We wish we didn’t have to keep covering news that chips away at the rights of our community. But here we are again, sharing a ruling that takes us several steps back — this time from the UK Supreme Court.
On Wednesday, Britain’s highest court ruled unanimously that the legal definition of a woman, under the Equality Act 2010, refers to a biological woman, not a trans woman, even one with a gender recognition certificate (GRC). In other words, according to the UK Supreme Court, a trans woman with legal documentation affirming her gender is still not recognized as a woman under sex-based protections in UK law.
Let that sink in.
The case was initially brought by campaigners from For Women Scotland, who challenged Scottish legislation meant to improve gender diversity on public boards. They argued that trans women should not be counted toward gender equality targets, and now, they’ve won. The ruling sets a dangerous precedent, one that could affect how trans women are treated when it comes to single-sex spaces like changing rooms, women’s shelters, and sports clubs.
While gender-critical campaigners cheered outside the courthouse, LGBTQ+ advocates sounded the alarm. Stonewall called the decision “incredibly worrying for the trans community.” Amnesty International warned of “potentially concerning consequences,” and trans activists like Ella Morgan expressed a fear that, sadly, resonates all too deeply with many of us.
“Today for the first time, I am scared about walking out of my front door,” Morgan told CNN.
Politicians are spinning the ruling as “clarity.” Labour called it reassuring, while Conservatives declared it a win for “common sense.” But let’s be real: this isn’t just about legal language. It’s about dignity. It’s about identity. It’s about whether trans people are treated as full and equal citizens, or seen as exceptions, loopholes, and technicalities.
This decision doesn’t erase all protections for trans people. The court noted that trans folks can still claim discrimination under gender reassignment protections, and that being perceived as a woman can, in itself, be grounds for a discrimination claim. But that’s cold comfort when your existence is being publicly debated and legally diminished.
We’ve seen this story before. In the U.S., it escalated under Trump’s administration. Around the world, the rights of LGBTQ+ people — especially trans people — are being eroded under the guise of “fairness” and “safety.” And the impact is not just legal. It’s emotional. It’s terrifying. In the UK alone, hate crimes against LGBTQ+ people soared by 112% in 2023. That’s not a coincidence. That’s the climate rulings like this one help create.
To our trans siblings in the UK: We see you. We grieve with you. And we stand with you. This ruling doesn’t define your worth, your womanhood, or your right to live openly, safely, and proudly. You are valid, and you are loved.
We may be tired, but we’re not giving up.
This is a developing story, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more information and responses come in. Stay tuned and stay safe.
Follow us on X and Instagram for all queer stuff!
Featured Image: Image via PA Wire. Credit Jane Barlow.
